Stanford science reformer Ioannidis exposes himself as incompetent or insincere — take your pick
I’ve always suspected that Stanford University professor John Ioannidis was only posing as a science reformer. His commentary in PLoS against the EPA science transparency rulemaking validates that.
Ioannidis pretends care about the quality of science. He has even published his claim that:
"Currently, many published research findings are false or exaggerated, and an estimated 85% of research resources are wasted"
Yet in his new article attacking the Trump EPA’s science transparency proposal,
Ionnidis praises the very secret science and science fraud that brought the EPA proposal about:
As readers of this page and my Amazon.com best seller “Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA” know, there is nothing remotely scientific or honest about the Harvard Six Cities and Pope ACS studies, or the alleged HEI review. The only thing that was “rigorous” was the fraud.
At the very least, Ioannidis has made no effort to learn the facts. At worst, he has been co-opted by Doug Dockery, Arden Pope and the EPA-funded air pollution mafia into aiding and abetting their fraud. Either way, Ioannidis has exposed himself.
I am certainly amazed that Ioannidis praises those rubbishy air pollution studies. I have over time reviewed a lot of them (e.g. here and here and here) and found that they were all naive about controls to the point of making their findings at best moot. A very simple demolition of the garbage mentioned above is here. Note that the alleged 2005 confirmation of the original results was simply a re-analysis of the original data that did nothing to address the lack of basic controls -- JR