tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9487055.post7168321968551249888..comments2024-03-26T05:56:59.938+11:00Comments on THE PSYCHOLOGIST : JRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00829082699850674281noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9487055.post-55870429605646259722015-05-29T11:09:53.232+10:002015-05-29T11:09:53.232+10:00"Their arguments do need to be refuted for th..."Their arguments do need to be refuted for the sake of the uncommitted middle..."<br />That is the most important point.<br />Some conservatives make the mistake of arguing with committed leftists as if trying to persuade them, or as if trying to eliminate leftism. Andrew Bolt does it occasionally. But that can't be done and is a waste of effort, and can cause one to slip into an emotional state opposing them, which can be an error. They should not be argue against unless one has an uncommitted audience to show them up in front of. It is the uncommitted middle who should be targeted by the light of reason, to prevent them being seduced by leftist fake goodness. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com