Next decade is crucial in combating declining ocean oxygen levels which are threatening sealife and could 'jeopardise humankind', experts warn
Knowing who did the study, it is unlikely to be anything but crass propaganda but some desultory comments spring to mind:
It is possible that oxygen levels have shown some decline but only in certain areas. Such declines are known in areas where there is a very heavy presence of marine life. So select your area and get the result you want.
According to Greenies, the oceans have been gobbling up lots of CO2 since about the beginning of this century. But CO2 is plant food so marine plants should be more abundant. But what do plants do? Convert CO2 to oxygen. So the oceans should now hold MORE oxygen, not less. Or have the oceans now stopped gobbling CO2? If so, when and why?
And if there is a decline it could hardly be due to global warming -- since there has been no recent warming according to the satellites. If the study were a serious one, they would have correlated global temperatures with oceanic oxgen levels. But there is no hint of that. I wonder why? The omission means that their case is totally unproven
The next decade will be crucial in combating declining ocean oxygen levels which are threatening sealife and could eventually put humankind at risk, according to experts.
The new study, which is the biggest report of its kind, was carried out by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Its findings were presented in Madrid, Spain, at the global UN Climate Change conference earlier today.
The researchers found that climate change and pollution were the main causes of oxygen loss, also known as deoxygenation.
There are thought to be more than 1,000 dead zones in the ocean, where deoxygenation has taken hold, with currently around 700 already confirmed.
But prior to 1960 there were just 45, showing that the areas completely depleted of oxygen have quadrupled over the past five decades.
Peter Thomson, the UN's special envoy for oceans, said in the study: 'I believe the report demonstrates that the next 10 years will be more important for humanity than the last hundred, indeed thousands of years have been for our survival.'
The report went on to say that deoxygenation is now altering the balance of marine life as it favours the species which do not require as much oxygen to thrive.
These include jellyfish, microbes and some squid.
Those particularly at risk include tuna, marlin and sharks because their size means that they have higher energy demands to their marine companions.
It seems as though these species are in turn moving to shallower areas where they become much more vulnerable to over-fishing.
There were 67 experts from 17 countries who were involved in the study.
IUCN acting director general, Dr Grethel Aguilar, said: 'With this report, the scale of damage climate change is wreaking upon the ocean comes into stark focus.
'As the warming ocean loses oxygen, the delicate balance of marine life is thrown into disarray.
'The potentially dire effects on fisheries and vulnerable coastal communities mean that the decisions made at the ongoing UN Climate Change Conference are even more crucial.'
Oceans are expected to lose up to four per cent of their oxygen by the end of the century and the report warns that the ripple effect could prove costly for millions of people.
Isabella Lovin, Sweden's minister for environment and climate, wrote in the report: 'Whilst we have known about dead zones in the ocean for many decades, ocean warming is now expected to further amplify deoxygenation across great swathes of the ocean.
'Ocean deoxygenation is putting life at risk. Failing to protect our ocean will jeopardize humankind, as our security, economy and our very own survival depends on it.'
Three of this year's Nobel Prize laureates recently spoke out about the need to address climate change during a news conference in Sweden.