The stupid Leftist dream of "affordable housing"
The dream is not stupid but the means Leftists use to address it invariably are. Read the article below and I will add some comments at the foot of it
Cambridge has emerged as ground zero in the struggle to create more affordable housing amid Greater Boston’s sizzling real estate market.
Sure, other communities — Newton and Arlington among them — are debating controversial zoning changes that could spur taller, bigger buildings. And in Boston, city councilors are weighing a new tax for high-end properties that would funnel money to affordable-housing construction.
But a step that the Cambridge City Council could take might be considered even more radical.
City officials are essentially deciding whether to establish an entirely new citywide zoning code, but one that just applies to 100-percent affordable residential projects.
Developers of these affordable units would be able to build taller and denser projects than what would normally be allowed in a particular neighborhood. Apartment buildings could go up in places currently limited to just one- or two-family homes.
The proposal drew passionate pleas from both sides during a City Council committee hearing on Wednesday. To many people, this zoning change is a long-needed concept that should be replicated in other Greater Boston cities to keep up with the intense demand for housing. To others, it’s the kind of well-intentioned urban planning that could wreck a neighborhood.
The truth is, Cambridge already does more than most communities. About 15 percent of the city’s housing stock is considered affordable, compared to a statewide average of nearly 10 percent.
But affordable-housing developers, many of them nonprofits, say this dramatic zoning change could be essential to compete in a city where 1,100-square-foot condos can hit the market for nearly $1 million.
Who the heck do these Leftist clowns think is going to build in these rezoned areas? Building any new building runs big financial risks so the final project has to be very profitable before any builder is prepared to leap in. And how is it going to be profitable if the owner can charge only "affordable" rents. I predict that one of two things will happen:
1) Nothing new will be built in the areas concerned as builders look elsewhere for profitable projects;
2). New projects will be built but the rents will be "affordable" to only a token degree. No other outcome is possible
What is needed to get housing costs down is deregulation in general and ending land use restrictions in particular, both of which are anathema to the control freaks of the Left
Post a Comment
All comments containing Chinese characters will not be published as I do not understand them