More Warmist crookedness
Joe Romm recently tried to show that the recent heavy snowfall in the N.E. of the U.S.coast area proved global warming. I pointed out the major logical fault in that claim recently and left the matter at that. Another strange thing about the claim however is to associate heavy snow with warming. Snow is cold stuff. Doesn't unusually heavy snow therefore indicate unusual cold, not unusual warmth?
But illogic is not the only fault in the article. Steve Goddard has recently put up the graph below which shows the claim to be utterly dishonest from the start. The Warmists involved are quite psychopathic in their lack of any ethics or morality.
Goddard went back to the original data and found that the whole claim is founded on a careful cherrypick from the data. They have used one of the oldest tricks of chartmanship: Choosing the range you display. And in this case extending the range displayed gives a totally opposite conclusion to the one drawn by the Warmists
If image does not come up click here