Greenhouse Gas Theory Trashed in replicated Lab Experiment

by John O'Sullivan

Professor Nahle of Monterrey, Mexico backed by a team of international scientists has faithfully recreated a famous experiment from 1909 to confirm that the greenhouse effect cannot cause global warming.

Astonishingly, the 1909 greenhouse gas experiment first performed by Professor Robert W. Wood at John Hopkins University hadn’t been replicated for a century. This despite over $100 billion spent by the man-made global warming industry trying to prove its case that carbon dioxide is a dangerous atmospheric pollutant.

The analogy had been that greenhouse gases (e.g. CO2) act like the glass in a greenhouse trapping heat in Earth’s atmosphere and if they build up (due to human industrial emissions) the planet would dangerously overheat.

At the Biology Cabinet laboratories Professor Nahle was able to confirm the astounding findings: Wood was right all along. After peer-review the results confirm that the so-called ‘greenhouse effect’ is solely due to the blockage of convective heat transfer within the environment in which it is contained i.e. as in this case, a lab flask.

Indeed, it is the glass of the lab flask (or ‘greenhouse’) that caused the “trapped” radiation all along. The flask (or greenhouse) being what scientists refer to as a ‘closed system’; while Earth’s atmosphere isn’t closed at all but rather open to space allowing heat energy to freely escape.

Nahle’s findings shoot holes in claims of Professor Pratt of Stanford University whose own replication of Wood’s experiment was touted as the first official reconstruction of Wood’s test for a century. Pratt claimed he had disproved Wood’s findings.

“This is the reason that I decided to repeat the experiment of Professor Pratt to either falsify or verify his results and those of Professor Wood,“ says the Mexican professor at the Biology Cabinet.

The Monterrey science research institute also recreated Wood’s test into the effect of longwave infrared radiation trapped inside a greenhouse. Unlike Pratt it found that Wood’s findings were correct, absolutely valid and systematically repeatable. The Bio Cab man affirms, “ the greenhouse effect does not exist as it is described in many didactic books and articles.”

Put simply, one of the aforementioned professors has their reputation perilously on the line and Nahle is gunning for an explanation from his U.S. Rival. A clue to the outcome: Pratt isn't even qualified in science - he's a (warmist) mathematician specializing in computers.

Much more HERE


  1. So the Second Law of Thermodynamics is still valid? Golly! Who knew!

    Empirical evidence is nice, of course, but any high school Physics student would know the 'Greenhouse Gas' theory was wrong because it violated basic laws of physics. You cannot 'close' a system and retain heat with an element in its gaseous form.

    Don't expect the Cult of Global Warming's priesthood to accept Nahle's results. They've known all along the theory was absurd. It's never been about the 'science'...

  2. The second law of Thermodynamics requires a closed system and one of the "results" is that pressure becomes uniform. Of course pressure is not uniform between earth and the upper troposphere (due to gravity) and so the atmosphere on this scale is not a closed system. This means in effect that convected heat trapped up high cannot drift back to earth in the same way that it would spread around an insulated room. There will always be a temperature gradient in the troposphere and above. See my site with more detail in Science Note 10.

  3. NASA has now DEBUNKED global warming in news of the century - see the first link (in the first para) at
    Doug Cotton


All comments containing Chinese characters will not be published as I do not understand them