Liberal fascism or islamic fascism

Fox News - By all appearances, Zachary Adam Chesser was the boy next door. He played football and was on the crew team at one of the best high schools in the country. He even studied Japanese. He was hardly the sort of boy you'd expect would suggest on a radical Islamic website that the creators of the edgy cartoon series "South Park" will be targeted for death.

...Two years later, Chesser is literally a changed man. He now uses an alias and has a new set of hobbies. He now likes to be called Abu Talhah Al-Amrikee, and his primary interest in this world appears to be Islamic radicalism.

Last week, Chesser, 20, posted a warning on the website following the 200th episode of "South Park," which included a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad disguised in a bear suit. The young man, who just two years ago was studying foreign languages at George Mason University, wrote on the site that Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the cartoon's creators, "will probably end up" like Theo van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker who was murdered in 2004 after making a film critical of Islamic society.
The experts on islam, not the expert followers of islam, would say ol' zack just found the true islam. The one that ol mo practiced, you know, the one full of violence, conquering, blood, murder etc. The western muslims will obviously dismiss this as not the true islam, but if you look closely, what this fellow says is all there in the koran, just read up on a few experts like Robert Spencer or IQ al Rassooli, they'll show you verse by verse and they'll even do you one better, they'll even give you examples where ol' mo set the example for his followers.

Meanwhile islam's useful western idiots continue to deny there's any real threat of islamic radicalism, it's all just overblown you see, a law & order issue, like breaking the speed limit or something and they always play it down. Nothing to worry over on islam, never mind that South Park has folded in the face of real /inferred threats from muslims, they keep harping on about the imaginary [in their pot-induced heads] threats and violence that never seem to materialize from the conservative side of politics.

Heck, they've even planted their own filth amongst us to smear and frame us and still they come up empty handed.

What this fellow said, liberals will say it's just free speech and there isn't any call for or incitement to violence. If only they could bring themselves to apply the same to a Conservative speaker like Ann Coulter. Before she even opened her mouth to say, 'thanks for having me', they were itching to charge her with something, anything; they were banning her posters and working tirelessly to drive her out of town.

I don't mind if western liberals want to shove their heads up their ass, they are free to do so and it'll probably keep them occupied, but what pisses me off is they insist that we all do the same too. The way western liberals want it, they want to reach a point where there will be far too many radicals and jihadists amongst us for any response to be meaningful.

The way I see it, some of them probably think, if they can't get us to live under the yoke of liberal fascism, they'll take us living under the yoke of islamic fascism as the next best option. Either way, freedom is something they secretly despise, see the slip-up from zero, [hat tip GeeeeeZ!] around the 17 second mark, confirms what a lot of us have thought of him for a while.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments containing Chinese characters will not be published as I do not understand them