tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9487055.post4994417895096530067..comments2024-03-26T05:56:59.938+11:00Comments on THE PSYCHOLOGIST : Capitalism is Codified Human Nature; Socialism is Not Human at AllJRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00829082699850674281noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9487055.post-61945381943343568762012-03-29T21:56:11.445+11:002012-03-29T21:56:11.445+11:00For the life of me I cannot see why this garbage h...For the life of me I cannot see why this garbage has been re-posted.<br /><br />Several of the founding fathers of the USA stated, clearly, that only if America were to remain a Christian nation, would it be able to continue.<br /><br />Why? Simple.<br /><br />There are two types of person: one who gives a damn about his-her neighbors to a sufficient degree (C), and one who does not (H).<br /><br />Christian vs. Hippie (humanist, atheist, deist, etc).<br /><br />Now, by nature every RATIONAL person resorts to H - it makes sense to take care of yourself, and let others take care of themselves. As a first level of consideration.<br /><br />Christians are FORCED to give a damn about their neighbors: so MOST of them DO. EVEN AT COST TO THEMSELVES - which is the second level of consideration. The result is a population comprised of people who are self-controlled, and will take care of societal problems as they arise (often on an individual level, or as part of some local group.)<br /><br />Non-Christians, hippies and the like, have no reason to give a damn, and so MOST do NOT. A population comprised of such people CANNOT exist as a functional community - it would devolve into bloody chaos. The ONLY WAY such people can gain the benefits of grouping together, is via EXTERNALLY imposed control. (Note that on the individual level hippies WILL NOT willingly contribute to helping the needy - government intervention is NECESSARY for this.)<br /><br />Socialism (of which communism is but a subset) is the most stable form of externally imposed control, WHEN a sufficiently large portion of the population is fairly educated.<br />Why is this so? The majority of the population are capable of sufficiently abstracted concepts of Justice - the existence of this is what makes them so hard to control. (People have a REAL problem with being treated unfairly, which is what tends to destroy most other dictatorial systems.)<br /><br />But of course, there are always those who are 'more equal' than others under socialism. But as long as all around you are treated as you are, you can part of a group: a grouping cannot hold if there is not justice-equality between its members.<br />A similar thing is found in Islam, which is another system of externally imposed control (via Sharia), where there is a privileged elite, and a secondary, brutalized, lower-class.<br /><br />Historically under Islam, the Muslim population are to live off 'taxes' imposed upon all non-Muslims: this matches the practices of socialism quite well, where the parasitic elites live off a lower-class.<br /><br />But it should be noted that internal to both classes, there is an equalizing justice system: i.e. individual elites have redress available against other elites, and the like.<br /><br />The hippies are not stupid, and are very well aware of the past and present failures of central control...<br />Socialism ultimately becomes sufficiently unjust (read corrupt) that people revolt.<br />Enter Chinese Communism: cradle to the grave thought-control, brutally implemented; coupled with generalized brutal repression of pretty much everything.<br />Chinese communism is the Final Socialist Model: technology and other advances in various disciplines allows for those in control to detect dissent, and high-tech weaponry which allows those in control to utterly crush any dissent.<br />And of course a majority of peasants who can do little more than spell their own names.<br /><br />The above is why the world is as it is, and why it is heading where it is heading. This article is... puerile.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com