Compare the two headlines below:
Victoria musician gets 10 years in HIV sex-assault
ZIMBABWEAN REFUGEE SENTENCED TO 10 YEARS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AFTER KNOWINGLY SPREADING HIV
Both headlines refer to the same facts and the same piece of scum. The first is from a major newspaper and the second is from the site of a talkshow host. Which do you think is most informative and most likely to be read? Hiding the truth seems to be a major objective of newspapers these days. May they all go bankrupt! Thank goodness that some of them are already bankrupt in a monetary sense. The vast majority of them have been bankrupt as reliable conveyors of information for a long time.
Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don't forget your daily roundup of pro-environment but anti-Greenie news and commentary at GREENIE WATCH . Email me (John Ray) here