THE PSYCHOLOGIST : Comments worthy of a post

Comments worthy of a post

In comments to this thread over at Tim Blair’s, regarding the very telling response from a staunch lefty when the chips appeared to be down. As is usual, they appear to have nailed this particular lefty (and most, I suspect) to the wall:

Ah yes, throw in a bunch of gratuitous insults before you get to the slight problem that when she fears a terrorist attack, she knows exactly what to look for. And then insults herself for admitting it.

What a nitwit. As near as I can puzzle out, Ms. Helen is conflating “fear” with “natural caution”, and saying that to be naturally wary of people of Middle Eastern appearance (in this new, jihadi-afflicted world no less) is akin to being afraid of the innocent for no viable reason.

In trying to explain away her own fear, she’s actually telling us that events like 9/11 and 7/7 and Bali shouldn’t matter because they didn’t happen in the immediate neighborhood. And they were televised besides, so naturally most of us sheeple can’t tell the difference between that and a “real” event.

Smug as well as being a nitwit.

Conservatives, “neocons”, and everyone else who takes seriously the threat of militant Islam, are usually described as frightened people, worked into their frothing state by their cynical, manipulative leaders like Bush, Rumsfeld, et. al., whose aim is to render us all into pants-wetting, lynch mobs with a succession of orange alerts. Articles like this reveal this whole fantasy to be yet another masterpiece of lefty projection, ascribing their own thrumming anxiety to their enemies in the hope of some vain relief.

Helen is rationalizing her own fears away from Islamic terrorists to....anything else, as near as I can tell. To sun worshipping Christians, mayhaps. Helen is pretty much a clueless person.

If there is a bigger group of clueless people, I don’t know who it would be. The left stands with the enemy, and as is usual in these cases, they are the very people who will be first in line to have their collective head chopped off at the nearest sports arena when their appeasement leads to a complete take-over.

I suppose it is because they actively evade and deny the evidence that they are so fearful. When you fail to integrate the information set before you, all you are left with is a terror that leaves you frozen when it is imperative that you act.

But here’s my favourite:

If I had a reaction anything like that to a flickering light on a train and a girl wearing a scarf, I would keep very very quiet about it. It would be a matter strictly between me and the therapist.

Nor am I at all surprised that all it took to turn Fisk from a “nice, friendly, liberal” to the leader of a mob wearing pointy hats and carrying burning torches was a diverted plane.

This phenomenon is well known. These people live in crippling irrational fear and moral cowardice. Just simmering beneath the surface is an ugly violent racism ready to erupt at any moment. The fear and the hate they project onto others. It is this that drives their politics and underpins everything they say and write.

It really must hurt to be ‘of the left’; to live in such a state of almost perpetual embarrassment (not to mention denial). But this final comment is worth noting and noting well:

Articles such as this and the current ‘Airport Imams’ controversy in the US are going to lead to a situation where law-enforcement’s best eyes and ears - the observant public - become crippled by political correctness, and a failure to report anything suspicious for fear of being branded a racist.

This is of course exactly what Islamist groups want.

The commenter is right, of course. Personally, I have no such fear – quite the opposite. I have reported suspicious activity. As seemingly obvious to me as it was at the time, it was still a hell of a surprise when, some twelve months later, the media reported foiled plans revolving around precisely what I thought I had seen, and had detailed in an email to the relevant hotline.

We cannot and must not let our guard down. Let the Helen Razors of this world tear their beards and wave the banners of self-loathing. I prefer to save my life and God knows how many others. PC can screw itself.

No comments:

Background

The essence of conservatism is caution. The essence of Leftism is anger

This blog is written solely by John Ray, who has a Ph.D. degree in psychology and 200+ papers published in the academic journals of the social sciences. It does occasionally comment on issues in psychology but is mainly aimed at giving a conservative psychologist's view on a broad range of topics. There are very few conservative psychologists.

The blog originated in Australia and many (but not most) posts discuss Australian matters. Australians have an unusually good awareness of events outside their own country. Australian newspapers feature news from Britain and the USA not as an afterthought but as a major part of their coverage. So Australians do tend to have a truly Western heart, which is the reason behind the old name for this blog. So events in Australia, Britain and the USA all feature frequently here, plus occasional coverage of other places, particularly Israel.

A primer in American politics for non-Americans:

SCOTUS is the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the land

The "GOP" stands for "Grand Old Party" and refers to the Republican party. The GOP is at present center/Right, while the Democrats have been undergoing a steady drift Leftwards and now have policies similar to mainstream European Leftist parties.

The ideological identity of both parties has however been very fluid -- almost reversing itself over time. In the mid 19th century, the GOP was the party of big government and concern for minorities while the Democrats advertised themselves as "The party of the white man" -- an orientation that lasted into the mid 20th century in the South. The Democrats are still obsessed with race but have now flipped into support for discrimination AGAINST whites.

Was Pope Urban VIII the first Warmist? Below we see him refusing to look through Galileo's telescope. People tend to refuse to consider evidence— if what they might discover contradicts what they believe.

Global warming

Calibrated in whole degrees. Larger graph here

Climate scientist Lennart Bengtsson said. “The warming we have had the last 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have meteorologists and climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all.”

The term "Fascism" is mostly used by the Left as a brainless term of abuse. But when they do make a serious attempt to define it, they produce very complex and elaborate definitions -- e.g. here and here. In fact, Fascism is simply extreme socialism plus nationalism. But great gyrations are needed to avoid mentioning the first part of that recipe, of course.

Two examples of Leftist racism below (much more here and here):

Beatrice Webb, a founder of the London School of Economics and the Fabian Society, and married to a Labour MP, mused in 1922 on whether when English children were "dying from lack of milk", one should extend "the charitable impulse" to Russian and Chinese children who, if saved this year, might anyway die next. Besides, she continued, there was "the larger question of whether those races are desirable inhabitants" and "obviously" one wouldn't "spend one's available income" on "a Central African negro".

Hugh Dalton, offered the Colonial Office during Attlee's 1945-51 Labour government, turned it down because "I had a horrid vision of pullulating, poverty stricken, diseased nigger communities, for whom one can do nothing in the short run and who, the more one tries to help them, are querulous and ungrateful."

Defensible and indefensible usages of the term "racism"

The book, The authoritarian personality, authored by T.W. Adorno et al. in 1950, has been massively popular among psychologists. It claims that a set of ideas that were popular in the "Progressive"-dominated America of the prewar era were "authoritarian". Leftist regimes always are authoritarian so that claim was not a big problem. What was quite amazing however is that Adorno et al. identified such ideas as "conservative". They were in fact simply popular ideas of the day but ones that had been most heavily promoted by the Left right up until the then-recent WWII. See here for details of prewar "Progressive" thinking.

R.I.P. Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet deposed a law-defying Marxist President at the express and desperate invitation of the Chilean parliament. He pioneered the free-market reforms which Reagan and Thatcher later unleashed to world-changing effect. That he used far-Leftist methods to suppress far-Leftist violence is reasonable if not ideal. The Leftist view that they should have a monopoly of violence and that others should follow the law is a total absurdity which shows only that their hate overcomes their reason

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a war criminal. Both British and American codebreakers had cracked the Japanese naval code so FDR knew what was coming at Pearl Harbor. But for his own political reasons he warned no-one there. So responsibility for the civilian and military deaths at Pearl Harbor lies with FDR as well as with the Japanese. The huge firepower available at Pearl Harbor, both aboard ship and on land, could have largely neutered the attack. Can you imagine 8 battleships and various lesser craft firing all their AA batteries as the Japanese came in? The Japanese naval airforce would have been annihilated and the war would have been over before it began.

FDR prolonged the Depression. He certainly didn't cure it.

WWII did NOT end the Great Depression. It just concealed it. It in fact made living standards worse

Joe McCarthy was eventually proved right after the fall of the Soviet Union. To accuse anyone of McCarthyism is to accuse them of accuracy!

The KKK was intimately associated with the Democratic party. They ATTACKED Republicans!

People who mention differences in black vs. white IQ are these days almost universally howled down and subjected to the most extreme abuse. I am a psychometrician, however, so I feel obliged to defend the scientific truth of the matter:

The average African adult has about the same IQ as an average white 11-year-old and African Americans (who are partly white in ancestry) average out at a mental age of 14. The American Psychological Association is generally Left-leaning but it is the world's most prestigious body of academic psychologists. And even they have had to concede that sort of gap (one SD) in black vs. white average IQ. 11-year olds can do a lot of things but they also have their limits and there are times when such limits need to be allowed for.

America's uncivil war was caused by trade protectionism. The slavery issue was just camouflage, as Abraham Lincoln himself admitted. See also here

Did William Zantzinger kill poor Hattie Carroll?

Did Bismarck predict where WWI would start or was it just a "free" translation by Churchill?

Leftist psychologists have an amusingly simplistic conception of military organizations and military men. They seem to base it on occasions they have seen troops marching together on parade rather than any real knowledge of military men and the military life. They think that military men are "rigid" -- automatons who are unable to adjust to new challenges or think for themselves. What is incomprehensible to them is that being kadaver gehorsam (to use the extreme Prussian term for following orders) actually requires great flexibility -- enough flexibility to put your own ideas and wishes aside and do something very difficult. Ask any soldier if all commands are easy to obey.

A good article on Leftist hate

The real history of social Darwinism

Some personal memoirs

Memoir highlights

THE PSYCHOLOGIST

Comments worthy of a post

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive