Another UN Failure

I know. Using the words "UN" and "Failure" in the same sentence is rapidly becoming redundant. But it's true, and they've exceeded even my expectations:
KHARTOUM (Reuters) - Rebels from the Darfur region of western Sudan said on Tuesday a U.N. report was mistaken in failing to accuse the Sudan government and allied Arab militias of genocide in the Darfur conflict.

"If this report says there is no genocide in Darfur then we reject this report," Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) leader Khalil Ibrahim told Reuters by telephone from his headquarters in the Eritrean capital Asmara.

"There are hundreds of mass graves that the commission did not go to," he said, adding the decision to stop short of a genocide finding was political.

Leader Abdel Wahed Mohamed al-Nur of the main rebel group, the Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM), said the report was incomplete because U.N. investigators did not have access to areas where the worst fighting took place.

"But I am sure that the international community will in the future gain access to these areas in Darfur and will realize that genocide has occurred against our people here," said Nur, a former lawyer.

The U.N. report, released on Monday, recommended that unnmaed(sic) government officials and militia leaders be referred to the International Criminal Court for widespread and systematic abuses, which may constitute crimes against humanity but did not amount to genocide. The United States said last year genocide had occurred in Darfur.
Wait a minute... That almost looks as though a UN Commission didn't go where it needed to, and didn't look at what it was required to, before reaching a predetermined conclusion which favoured a murderous, tyrannical regime! Surely not!

Yes, and the Sudanese butchers are suitably pleased with their blue-helmeted Dhimmi friends:
Officials in Khartoum declined to comment immediately on the report, saying they needed more time to study the findings.

But Sudan's ambassador to Britain Hassan Abdin told the BBC in London: "We are grateful to the international commission for exonerating the Sudanese government of committing genocide... There was no genocide in Sudan."
The UN finding was "Yes, there's a lot of unnecessarily dead people here... we don't want to look everywhere because it might be dangerous, and because we might be forced to reach the wrong conclusion. Look, it's bad, but let's just say that we didn't see enough dead people, and that way we can avoid using insensitive language like 'genocide'."

The UN is without any definable worth, and performs no useful function. It needs to be disbanded and replaced with something workable, with actual powers of coersion.

I know what we'll call it. How about "The United States and its allies".

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments containing Chinese characters will not be published as I do not understand them